Celeris-1 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) scores 19.7 points higher (26.0 vs 6.3) but costs 3.9× as much to run the benchmark ($231 vs $60.0; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 26.0 | +312.7% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 4.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $231.08 | +285.2% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 3.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 49.36s | +5573.6% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 5573.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Celeris-1: 312.7% more intelligence, 285.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 5573.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Celeris-1MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill