Celeris-1 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-17.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Celeris-1: 246.0% more intelligence, 36.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 4883.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.4 | 42.9 | +246.0% MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 3.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $156.79 | $98.86 | −36.9% MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 36.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.97s | 48.34s | +4883.5% MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 4883.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 50.10 for $95.1.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 50.10 for $95.1.
Celeris-1MiMo-V2.5-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill