Celeris-1 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores 20.1 points higher (26.4 vs 6.3) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($138 vs $60.0; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Celeris-1.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 26.4 | +319.0% MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 4.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $138.26 | +130.5% MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.97s | 72.58s | +7382.5% MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 7382.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Celeris-1: 319.0% more intelligence, 130.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 7382.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 22.30 for $42.6.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Celeris-1MiMo-V2.5-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill