Celeris-1 vs MiniMax-M3
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3 scores 22.9 points higher (29.2 vs 6.3) but costs 9.0× as much to run the benchmark ($538 vs $60.0; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiniMax-M3 when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | MiniMax-M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 29.2 | +363.5% MiniMax-M3 is 4.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $537.98 | +796.8% MiniMax-M3 is 9.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 26.74s | +2973.6% MiniMax-M3 is 2973.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
MiniMax-M3 vs Celeris-1: 363.5% more intelligence, 796.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2973.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Celeris-1MiniMax-M3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill