Celeris-1 vs Mistral Small 3.1
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Mistral Small 3.1 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Mistral Small 3.1
Mistral Small 3.1 vs Celeris-1: 12.7% more intelligence, 53.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1254.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Mistral Small 3.1 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 7.1 | +12.7% Mistral Small 3.1 is 12.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $27.82 | −53.6% Mistral Small 3.1 is 53.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 11.78s | +1254.0% Mistral Small 3.1 is 1254.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.08 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Mistral Small 3.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Celeris-1Mistral Small 3.1Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/mistral-small-3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/mistral-small-3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill