Celeris-1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 18.9 points higher (25.2 vs 6.3) but costs 7.1× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $60.0; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Plus when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 25.2 | +300.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 4.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $427.73 | +613.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 7.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 46.20s | +5210.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 5210.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Celeris-1: 300.0% more intelligence, 613.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 5210.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Celeris-1Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill