Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) scores 4.8 points higher (34.3 vs 29.5) but costs 5.8× as much to run the benchmark ($200 vs $34.3; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) when you need intelligence above 29.5, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) when 29.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 34.3 | +16.3% DeepSeek V4 Flash 073… is 16.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $34.31 | $199.63 | +481.8% DeepSeek V4 Flash 073… is 5.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.63s | 18.07s | +70.0% DeepSeek V4 Flash 073… is 70.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low): 16.3% more intelligence, 481.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/deepseek-v4-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/deepseek-v4-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill