Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 13.9 points higher (55.1 vs 41.2) but costs 20× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $158; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 41.2, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) when 41.2 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 55.1 | +33.7% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 33.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $3,117.31 | +1878.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 20× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 69.98s | 55.12s | −21.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 21.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 33.7% more intelligence, 1878.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 21.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Kimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill