Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs GLM-5.3-Flash
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) scores 1.6 points higher (43.4 vs 41.8) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($330 vs $306; both mid-range class). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GLM-5.3-Flash.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | GLM-5.3-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 41.8 | −3.7% GLM-5.3-Flash is 3.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $305.52 | −7.5% GLM-5.3-Flash is 7.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 318.47s | 37.69s | −88.2% GLM-5.3-Flash is 88.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.15 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GLM-5.3-Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 3.7% less intelligence, 7.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 88.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)GLM-5.3-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/glm-5-3-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/glm-5-3-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill