Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) by Anthropic or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 5.2 points higher (29.5 vs 24.3) but costs 3.5× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $653; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Max when you need intelligence above 24.3, and Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) when 24.3 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.3 | 29.5 | +21.4% Qwen3.7 Max is 21.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $652.70 | $2,277.12 | +248.9% Qwen3.7 Max is 3.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.68s | 16.62s | +91.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 91.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Low): 21.4% more intelligence, 248.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Low)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-low/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-low/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill