DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) scores 3.6 points higher (11.4 vs 7.8) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($461 vs $159; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 3.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 7.8 | −31.6% Solar Pro 3 is 31.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | $159.22 | −65.4% Solar Pro 3 is 65.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.16s | 18.88s | −6.3% Solar Pro 3 is 6.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): 31.6% less intelligence, 65.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 6.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill