DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-01.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 16.5 points higher (35.0 vs 18.5) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($4722 vs $310; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 18.5, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) when 18.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 35.0 | +89.2% Grok 4.7 (High) is 89.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $310.24 | $4,721.61 | +1421.9% Grok 4.7 (High) is 15× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.00s | 54.04s | +1251.0% Grok 4.7 (High) is 1251.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning): 89.2% more intelligence, 1421.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1251.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 42.30 for $267.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) scores 55.30 for $3746.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill