DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-01.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 12.4 points higher (30.9 vs 18.5) but costs 7.0× as much to run the benchmark ($2169 vs $310; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when you need intelligence above 18.5, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) when 18.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 30.9 | +67.0% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 67.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $310.24 | $2,168.65 | +599.0% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 7.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 3.92s | 12.00s | +206.1% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 206.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning): 67.0% more intelligence, 599.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 206.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 42.30 for $267.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill