DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) vs Inkling (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Inkling (Xhigh) by Thinking Machines? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-01.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning)
Inkling (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning): 32.4% less intelligence, 298.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 262.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) | Inkling (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 12.5 | −32.4% Inkling (Xhigh) is 32.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $310.24 | $1,236.66 | +298.6% Inkling (Xhigh) is 4.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 3.94s | 14.28s | +262.4% Inkling (Xhigh) is 262.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.00 / $4.05 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 42.30 for $267.
- Inkling (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning)Inkling (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/inkling · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/inkling?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill