DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 14.1 points higher (34.8 vs 20.7) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $331; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when you need intelligence above 20.7, and GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) when 20.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 20.7 | −40.5% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 40.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $331.24 | −69.4% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 69.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.08s | 80.72s | +402.0% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 402.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.20 / $1.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 40.5% less intelligence, 69.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 402.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-5-4-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-5-4-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill