DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 8.3 points higher (34.8 vs 26.5) but costs 3.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $286; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when you need intelligence above 26.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 26.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 26.5 | −23.9% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 23.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $286.07 | −73.5% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 73.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.95s | 6.31s | −60.4% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 60.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 23.9% less intelligence, 73.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 60.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill