DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) scores 13.8 points higher (36.0 vs 22.2) but costs 3.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1122 vs $366; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when you need intelligence above 22.2, and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when 22.2 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 22.2 | −38.3% Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 38.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $365.63 | −67.4% Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 67.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.92s | 8.69s | −66.5% Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 66.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.30 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 38.3% less intelligence, 67.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 66.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/gemini-3-5-flash-lite · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/gemini-3-5-flash-lite?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill