Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores 14.4 points higher (22.2 vs 7.8) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($366 vs $159; both mid-range class). Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 3.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 7.8 | −64.9% Solar Pro 3 is 64.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $159.22 | −56.5% Solar Pro 3 is 56.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.69s | 18.88s | +117.3% Solar Pro 3 is 117.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 64.9% less intelligence, 56.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 117.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteSolar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill