Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) by Google or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-04.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) scores 7.7 points higher (54.2 vs 46.5) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($5725 vs $3153; both flagship class). Pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K3.1 Pro.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 54.2 | 46.5 | −14.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 14.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,725.02 | $3,152.80 | −44.9% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 44.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.28s | 85.02s | +422.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 422.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Low): 14.2% less intelligence, 44.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 422.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.40 for $4766.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)Kimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-low/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-low/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill