Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) by Google or Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-02.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 23.4 points higher (57.7 vs 34.3) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($5903 vs $5784; both flagship class). Pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.7 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 57.7 | 34.3 | −40.6% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 40.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,903.03 | $5,784.27 | −2.0% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 2.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 117.30s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium): 40.6% less intelligence, 2.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.00 for $4766.
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium)Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/grok-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/grok-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill