GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 5.4 points higher (29.5 vs 24.1) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $1524; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Qwen3.7 Max when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh).
| Metric | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.1 | 29.5 | +22.4% Qwen3.7 Max is 22.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,524.02 | $2,277.12 | +49.4% Qwen3.7 Max is 49.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 109.06s | 16.67s | −84.7% Qwen3.7 Max is 84.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $4.50 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh): 22.4% more intelligence, 49.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill