GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 4.5 points higher (25.2 vs 20.7) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $331; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3.7 Plus when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh).
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 25.2 | +21.7% Qwen3.7 Plus is 21.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $427.73 | +29.1% Qwen3.7 Plus is 29.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 105.67s | 45.45s | −57.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 57.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 21.7% more intelligence, 29.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 57.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill