GPT-5.5 (High) vs LongCat 2.0
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI or LongCat 2.0 by LongCat? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (High) scores 17.9 points higher (37.0 vs 19.1) but costs 6.3× as much to run the benchmark ($3411 vs $545; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (High) when you need intelligence above 19.1, and LongCat 2.0 when 19.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (High) | LongCat 2.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.0 | 19.1 | −48.4% LongCat 2.0 is 48.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,410.76 | $544.74 | −84.0% LongCat 2.0 is 84.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.79s | 35.54s | +79.6% LongCat 2.0 is 79.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.75 / $2.95 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
LongCat 2.0 vs GPT-5.5 (High): 48.4% less intelligence, 84.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 79.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- LongCat 2.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-5.5 (High)LongCat 2.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/longcat-2-0 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/longcat-2-0?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill