GPT-5.5 (Medium) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (Medium) by OpenAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 18.6 points higher (52.4 vs 33.8) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $2095; both flagship class). Pick Muse Wonder (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.5 (Medium).
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (Medium) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.8 | 52.4 | +55.0% Muse Wonder (Max) is 55.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,095.12 | $5,786.78 | +176.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 2.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.97s | 40.70s | +308.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 308.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs GPT-5.5 (Medium): 55.0% more intelligence, 176.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 308.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
GPT-5.5 (Medium)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-medium/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-medium/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill