GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) by OpenAI or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 13.0 points higher (55.1 vs 42.1) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $2501; both flagship class). Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.6 Terra (Max).
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 55.1 | +30.9% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 30.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,500.72 | $3,117.31 | +24.7% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 24.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 104.98s | 42.64s | −59.4% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 59.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Max): 30.9% more intelligence, 24.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max)Kimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill