GPT-5 mini (High) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-5 mini (High) by OpenAI or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 25.9 points higher (42.7 vs 16.8) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $189; both mid-range class). Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5 mini (High).
| Metric | GPT-5 mini (High) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.8 | 42.7 | +154.2% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 2.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $188.66 | $283.18 | +50.1% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 50.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 58.74s | 23.83s | −59.4% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 59.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $2.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GPT-5 mini (High): 154.2% more intelligence, 50.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5 mini (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5 mini (High)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill