GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) scores 0.7 points higher (34.8 vs 34.1) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($238 vs $95.7; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Ember (Xhigh).
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 34.1 | −2.0% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 2.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $237.91 | $95.73 | −59.8% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 59.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.11s | 9.48s | −21.7% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 21.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low): 2.0% less intelligence, 59.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 21.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.20 for $190.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Muse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill