GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low): 5.5% less intelligence, 44.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 297.7% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 39.8 | −5.5% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 5.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.48 | $362.72 | +44.8% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 44.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.69s | 50.47s | +297.7% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 297.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.15 / $0.47 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Qwen3.8-Flash-NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill