GPT-6 Luna (Max) vs Granite 4.2 30B
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI or Granite 4.2 30B by IBM? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 25.4 points higher (38.1 vs 12.7) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($122 vs $111; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6 Luna (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Granite 4.2 30B.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Max) | Granite 4.2 30B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.1 | 12.7 | −66.7% Granite 4.2 30B is 66.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.05 | $110.83 | −9.2% Granite 4.2 30B is 9.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 82.02s | 36.08s | −56.0% Granite 4.2 30B is 56.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.16 / $0.65 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Granite 4.2 30B vs GPT-6 Luna (Max): 66.7% less intelligence, 9.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
GPT-6 Luna (Max)Granite 4.2 30BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/granite-4-2-30b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/granite-4-2-30b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill