GPT-6 Luna (Max) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 2.1 points higher (40.2 vs 38.1) but costs 26× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $122; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max when you need intelligence above 38.1, and GPT-6 Luna (Max) when 38.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Max) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.1 | 40.2 | +5.5% Qwen3.8 Max is 5.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.05 | $3,172.37 | +2499.2% Qwen3.8 Max is 26× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 93.85s | 64.37s | −31.4% Qwen3.8 Max is 31.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-6 Luna (Max): 5.5% more intelligence, 2499.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 31.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-6 Luna (Max)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill