gpt-oss-120b (High) vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-120b (High) by OpenAI or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Mini 4 scores 12.5 points higher (24.1 vs 11.6) but costs 4.1× as much to run the benchmark ($502 vs $123; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Solar Mini 4 when you need intelligence above 11.6, and gpt-oss-120b (High) when 11.6 is enough.
| Metric | gpt-oss-120b (High) | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.6 | 24.1 | +107.8% Solar Mini 4 is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.71 | $502.02 | +309.1% Solar Mini 4 is 4.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.61s | 27.46s | +136.5% Solar Mini 4 is 136.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Mini 4 vs gpt-oss-120b (High): 107.8% more intelligence, 309.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 136.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-120b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
gpt-oss-120b (High)Solar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill