Granite 4.2 30B vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 30B by IBM or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 vs Granite 4.2 30B: 71.7% more intelligence, 44.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2.3% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 30B | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.7 | 21.8 | +71.7% MiMo-V2.5 is 71.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $110.83 | $61.93 | −44.1% MiMo-V2.5 is 44.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 55.20s | 53.92s | −2.3% MiMo-V2.5 is 2.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.16 / $0.65 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Granite 4.2 30BMiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill