Granite 4.2 30B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 30B by IBM or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 33.6 points higher (46.3 vs 12.7) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($207 vs $111; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Granite 4.2 30B.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 30B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.7 | 46.3 | +264.6% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 3.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $110.83 | $206.66 | +86.5% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 86.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 36.08s | 48.29s | +33.8% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 33.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.16 / $0.65 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Granite 4.2 30B: 264.6% more intelligence, 86.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 33.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Granite 4.2 30BMiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill