Granite 4.2 30B vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 30B by IBM or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Granite 4.2 30B
Solar Pro 3 vs Granite 4.2 30B: 38.6% less intelligence, 43.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.3% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 30B | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.7 | 7.8 | −38.6% Solar Pro 3 is 38.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $110.83 | $159.22 | +43.7% Solar Pro 3 is 43.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 51.51s | 18.88s | −63.3% Solar Pro 3 is 63.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.16 / $0.65 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Granite 4.2 30BSolar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill