Granite 4.2 8B vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 8B by IBM or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Hy3 scores 14.2 points higher (25.3 vs 11.1) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($150 vs $53.1; both mid-range class). Pick Hy3 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Granite 4.2 8B.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 8B | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.1 | 25.3 | +127.9% Hy3 is 2.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $53.07 | $149.61 | +181.9% Hy3 is 2.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 39.25s | 33.29s | −15.2% Hy3 is 15.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.06 / $0.25 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Hy3 vs Granite 4.2 8B: 127.9% more intelligence, 181.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 15.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (High) scores 32.90 for $47.9.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Granite 4.2 8BHy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-8b/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-8b/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill