Grok 4.3 (High) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (High) by SpaceXAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 0.3 points higher (25.2 vs 24.9) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $363; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3.7 Plus when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.3 (High).
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (High) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.9 | 25.2 | +1.2% Qwen3.7 Plus is 1.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $363.24 | $427.73 | +17.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 17.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.84s | 46.21s | +66.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 66.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Grok 4.3 (High): 1.2% more intelligence, 17.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 66.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Grok 4.3 (High)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill