Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores 14.5 points higher (39.8 vs 25.3) but costs 2.4× as much to run the benchmark ($363 vs $150; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3.8-Flash-Next when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Hy3.
| Metric | Hy3 | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 39.8 | +57.3% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 57.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.61 | $362.72 | +142.4% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 2.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.13s | 50.25s | +51.7% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 51.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.56 | $0.15 / $0.47 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Hy3: 57.3% more intelligence, 142.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Hy3Qwen3.8-Flash-NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill