Kimi K2.7 Code vs Mercury 2.5
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Mercury 2.5 by Inception? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 13.5 points higher (25.8 vs 12.3) but costs 4.6× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $218; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 12.3, and Mercury 2.5 when 12.3 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Mercury 2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 12.3 | −52.3% Mercury 2.5 is 52.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $218.11 | −78.0% Mercury 2.5 is 78.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.75s | 4.39s | −90.6% Mercury 2.5 is 90.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.25 / $0.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Mercury 2.5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.3% less intelligence, 78.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Mercury 2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMercury 2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/mercury-2-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/mercury-2-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill