Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi or Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 11.2 points higher (55.1 vs 43.9) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $1552; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Ling 3.1 Flash 1019.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 55.1 | 43.9 | −20.3% Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 20.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,117.31 | $1,551.81 | −50.2% Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 50.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 42.64s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: 20.3% less intelligence, 50.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Kimi K3.1 ProLing 3.1 Flash 1019Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/ling-3-1-flash-1019 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/ling-3-1-flash-1019?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill