Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 17.2 points higher (55.1 vs 37.9) but costs 28× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $110; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 37.9, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash when 37.9 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 55.1 | 37.9 | −31.2% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 31.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,117.31 | $109.55 | −96.5% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 96.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 42.64s | 49.53s | +16.2% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 16.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: 31.2% less intelligence, 96.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 16.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Kimi K3.1 ProMiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill