Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs MiniMax-M3
Which is better for the money: Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by InclusionAI or MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 scores 14.7 points higher (43.9 vs 29.2) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1552 vs $538; both premium class). Pick Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiniMax-M3.
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | MiniMax-M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 29.2 | −33.5% MiniMax-M3 is 33.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,551.81 | $537.98 | −65.3% MiniMax-M3 is 65.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 26.74s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
MiniMax-M3 vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: 33.5% less intelligence, 65.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019MiniMax-M3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill