Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by InclusionAI or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 scores 19.8 points higher (43.9 vs 24.1) but costs 3.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1552 vs $502; both premium class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 when you need intelligence above 24.1, and Solar Mini 4 when 24.1 is enough.
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 24.1 | −45.1% Solar Mini 4 is 45.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,551.81 | $502.02 | −67.6% Solar Mini 4 is 67.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 27.46s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Mini 4 vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: 45.1% less intelligence, 67.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019Solar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill