Llama 4 Scout vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Scout by Meta or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: 235.4% more intelligence, 15.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 832.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.5 | 21.8 | +235.4% MiMo-V2.5 is 3.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $73.56 | $61.93 | −15.8% MiMo-V2.5 is 15.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.00s | 46.61s | +832.2% MiMo-V2.5 is 832.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.18 / $0.66 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Llama 4 ScoutMiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill