Llama 4 Scout vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Scout by Meta or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 31.4 points higher (37.9 vs 6.5) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($110 vs $73.6; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Llama 4 Scout.
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.5 | 37.9 | +483.1% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 5.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $73.56 | $109.55 | +48.9% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 48.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.00s | 49.26s | +885.2% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 885.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.18 / $0.66 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Llama 4 Scout: 483.1% more intelligence, 48.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 885.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Llama 4 ScoutMiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill