Llama 4 Scout vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Scout by Meta or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 39.8 points higher (46.3 vs 6.5) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($207 vs $73.6; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Llama 4 Scout.
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.5 | 46.3 | +612.3% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 7.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $73.56 | $206.66 | +180.9% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 2.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.00s | 46.84s | +836.8% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 836.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.18 / $0.66 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Llama 4 Scout: 612.3% more intelligence, 180.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 836.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Llama 4 ScoutMiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill