MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 16.1 points higher (37.9 vs 21.8) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($110 vs $61.9; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiMo-V2.5.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.8 | 37.9 | +73.9% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 73.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $61.93 | $109.55 | +76.9% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 76.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 41.73s | 49.53s | +18.7% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 18.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.13 / $0.27 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.5: 73.9% more intelligence, 76.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 18.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill