MiMo-V2.5 vs MiniMax-M3
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi or MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3 scores 7.4 points higher (29.2 vs 21.8) but costs 8.7× as much to run the benchmark ($538 vs $61.9; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiniMax-M3 when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.8 | 29.2 | +33.9% MiniMax-M3 is 33.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $61.93 | $537.98 | +768.7% MiniMax-M3 is 8.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 41.73s | 26.74s | −35.9% MiniMax-M3 is 35.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.13 / $0.27 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
MiniMax-M3 vs MiMo-V2.5: 33.9% more intelligence, 768.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 35.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
MiMo-V2.5MiniMax-M3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill