MiMo-V2.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 20.9 points higher (42.7 vs 21.8) but costs 4.6× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $61.9; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.8 | 42.7 | +95.9% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 95.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $61.93 | $283.18 | +357.3% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 4.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 53.92s | 23.52s | −56.4% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 56.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.13 / $0.27 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs MiMo-V2.5: 95.9% more intelligence, 357.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
MiMo-V2.5MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill