MiMo-V2.5 vs Ring-2.6-1T
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi or Ring-2.6-1T by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5
Ring-2.6-1T vs MiMo-V2.5: 23.9% less intelligence, 829.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 48.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | Ring-2.6-1T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.8 | 16.6 | −23.9% Ring-2.6-1T is 23.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $61.93 | $575.60 | +829.4% Ring-2.6-1T is 9.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.61s | 24.04s | −48.4% Ring-2.6-1T is 48.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.13 / $0.27 | $0.30 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Ring-2.6-1T is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
MiMo-V2.5Ring-2.6-1TToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/ring-2-6-1t · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/ring-2-6-1t?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill