MiMo-V2.5 vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Mini 4 scores 2.3 points higher (24.1 vs 21.8) but costs 8.1× as much to run the benchmark ($502 vs $61.9; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Solar Mini 4 when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.8 | 24.1 | +10.6% Solar Mini 4 is 10.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $61.93 | $502.02 | +710.6% Solar Mini 4 is 8.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 41.73s | 27.46s | −34.2% Solar Mini 4 is 34.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.13 / $0.27 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Mini 4 vs MiMo-V2.5: 10.6% more intelligence, 710.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 34.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
MiMo-V2.5Solar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill